Speaker
Mark R Brengelman
Industry
Healthcare
Speciality
HIPAA and Compliance
Calendar
May 24, 2022 , 01 : 00 PM EST | 1 Days Left
Duration
60 Minutes
Description
Recording Defense Medical Examinations and Psychological Evaluations and Assessments Used in a Court of Law: Is it allowed? Best Practices and Current Standards.
This new and advanced, Psychological Evaluation and Assessments webinar examines the court standards a judge may use to allow a defense medical examination to be recorded for scrutiny. Injury cases in the court system allow for mental health damages as personal injury. Mental injuries can be more subjective than physical injuries, yet sympathetic plaintiffs stand to gain thousands of dollars in money damages for them.
Because of the thousands of dollars at stake, defense attorneys and their insurance companies who bankroll them will often hire their own expert witness doctor to perform their own Defense Medical Examination.
How can the plaintiff counter such inquiries? There will be a demand for the recording of the Defense Medical Examination or the permission to have the event observed by a third party.
Under what standards, if any, may a court allow recording the doctor’s work while it is being performed?
The appellate courts of New Jersey examined these very issues in three separate personal injury cases combined with standards for how all such actions may allow the recording of a Defense Medical Examination. The courts outlined a framework for both the recording of Defense Medical Examinations and the allowance of third parties simply to observe them.
See how judges of the trial court may decide on a case-by-case basis how and even whether to allow these third-party observations or the recording of the entire Defense Medical Examination.
Inflexible rules will not do in these cases where “too many permutations of circumstances” require an inflexible rule to be used in all situations. Whose burden is it then to demonstrate those standards have been met?
Find out in this new, and advanced Psychological Evaluations webinar that provides answers as to recording Defense Medical Examinations and Psychological Evaluations and Assessments.
Areas Covered
Background
Injury cases in the court system allow for damages for physical and mental injuries. While mental injuries can be more subjective, a sympathetic plaintiff stands to reap thousands of dollars for it.
Defense attorneys and their insurance companies are heavily invested in disproving mental injuries and will hire their own expert witnesses to perform a Defense Medical Examination.
Plaintiff’s counsel will counter these efforts by demanding to record the doctor’s evaluation in progress to point out bias and flaws. Under what standards, if any, will a court allow the recording of a doctor’s work while it is being performed?
Why Should You Attend
Erase the fear, uncertainty, and doubt over proving your case for mental injures when the defense hires its own expert to disprove yours.
When the defense hires its own doctor to examine a party plaintiff, when may a court allow the recording of a doctor’s work while it is being performed, if such recording is allowed at all?
Who Should Attend
(Attorney at Law, PLLC)
Mark R. Brengelman became interested in law when he graduated with both Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Philosophy from Emory University in Atlanta. He earned a Juris Doctorate from the University of Kentucky College of Law. Mark became an Assistant Attorney General in Kentucky in the area of administrative and professional law as the assigned counsel and prosecuting attorney to numerous health professions licensure boards.
He retired from the state government, became certified as a hearing officer, and opened his own law practice, including work as a legislative agent (lobbyist).
As a frequent participant in continuing education, Mark has been a presenter for over fifty national and state organizations and private companies as the:
This also includes FARB’s member clients as the:
Mark was the founding presenter for “Navigating Ethics and Law for Mental Health Professionals,” approved by five Kentucky licensure boards. He also founded “The Kentucky Code of Ethical Conduct: Ethical Practice; Risk Management, and; the Code of Ethical Conduct” as an approved, state-mandated continuing education for social workers offered as a video-on-demand.
Mark has now worked for all three branches of state government has worked since June 2018 as the Enforcement Counsel for the Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission, an independent regulatory body that oversees 138 elected state legislators and nearly 800 registered lobbyists. Continuing as an ethics attorney, Mark is also the contract counsel for the Ethics Commission of the Louisville Metro Government, a city and county merged government, the largest city in Kentucky, and the 45th largest metropolitan statistical area in the United States.
Mark focuses on representing health care practitioners before licensure boards and in other professional regulatory matters and representing children as Guardian ad Litem and parents as Court Appointed Counsel in confidential child dependency, neglect, and abuse proceedings and termination of parental rights and adoption proceedings in family court.