Recording Defense Medical Examinations and Psychological Evaluations and Assessments Used in a Court of Law

Webinar Details

Speaker

Mark R Brengelman

Industry

Healthcare

Speciality

HIPAA and Compliance Conference

Available

All Days

Duration

60 Minutes


Registration Options

Choose Your Options

Error Conference Exists In Wish-list.

Congrats Conference Added In Wish-list.



Need Corporate Discount ?

Find More Webinars Of : HIPAA and Compliance Conference

  • * For more than 6 attendee call us at +1-800-803-7592 or mail us at cs@conferencepanel.com
  • * For Check and ACH payment call us at +1-800-803-7592 or mail us at cs@conferencepanel.com
  • * Click to download the Order Form

Description

Recording Defense Medical Examinations and Psychological Evaluations and Assessments Used in a Court of Law: Is it allowed?  Best Practices and Current Standards.

This new and advanced, Psychological Evaluation and Assessments webinar examines the court standards a judge may use to allow a defense medical examination to be recorded for scrutiny. Injury cases in the court system allow for mental health damages as personal injury. Mental injuries can be more subjective than physical injuries, yet sympathetic plaintiffs stand to gain thousands of dollars in money damages for them.

Because of the thousands of dollars at stake, defense attorneys and their insurance companies who bankroll them will often hire their own expert witness doctor to perform their own Defense Medical Examination.

How can the plaintiff counter such inquiries? There will be a demand for the recording of the Defense Medical Examination or the permission to have the event observed by a third party.

Under what standards, if any, may a court allow recording the doctor’s work while it is being performed?

The appellate courts of New Jersey examined these very issues in three separate personal injury cases combined with standards for how all such actions may allow the recording of a Defense Medical Examination. The courts outlined a framework for both the recording of Defense Medical Examinations and the allowance of third parties simply to observe them.

See how judges of the trial court may decide on a case-by-case basis how and even whether to allow these third-party observations or the recording of the entire Defense Medical Examination.

Inflexible rules will not do in these cases where “too many permutations of circumstances” require an inflexible rule to be used in all situations. Whose burden is it then to demonstrate those standards have been met?

Find out in this new, and advanced Psychological Evaluations webinar that provides answers as to recording Defense Medical Examinations and Psychological Evaluations and Assessments.

Areas Covered

  • Outline of Plaintiff’s damages necessitating expert witness testimony on mental health diagnoses
  • Explanation of the necessity of the use of a defense medical expert
  • Types of doctors who may perform an expert witness evaluation and more importantly testify about it
  • Examples of standards in state licensure law that may prevent a mental health professional from allowing such a recording
  • Examples of national codes of ethics used for guidance by the courts and how codes of ethics may not apply
  • Review a new case from the New Jersey appellate courts on if and when a litigant may record examinations by medical professionals retained by defendants – or have third parties accompany them to such a session.

Background

Injury cases in the court system allow for damages for physical and mental injuries. While mental injuries can be more subjective, a sympathetic plaintiff stands to reap thousands of dollars for it.

Defense attorneys and their insurance companies are heavily invested in disproving mental injuries and will hire their own expert witnesses to perform a Defense Medical Examination.

Plaintiff’s counsel will counter these efforts by demanding to record the doctor’s evaluation in progress to point out bias and flaws. Under what standards, if any, will a court allow the recording of a doctor’s work while it is being performed?

Why Should You Attend

Erase the fear, uncertainty, and doubt over proving your case for mental injures when the defense hires its own expert to disprove yours.

When the defense hires its own doctor to examine a party plaintiff, when may a court allow the recording of a doctor’s work while it is being performed, if such recording is allowed at all?

Who Should Attend

  • Plaintiff’s attorneys
  • Mental health professionals
  • Defense attorneys
  • Insurance attorneys
  • Insurance adjustors
  • Psychiatrists
  • Psychologists
  • Social workers
  • Marriage and family therapists
  • Professional clinical counselors
  • Alcohol and drug counselors
  • Pastoral counselors
Mark R Brengelman
Mark R Brengelman

(Attorney at Law, PLLC)

Mark holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Philosophy from Emory University and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Kentucky.

Retiring as an Assistant Attorney General, he now represents:

  • Healthcare professionals
  • Two government healthcare licensure boards
  • A government ethics commission
  • Parents and kids in confidential child abuse and neglect cases, termination of parental rights, and adoption proceedings

Mark is a frequent continuing education presenter including national organizations around the country.  He helps his clients navigate the law and ethics and make the rules understandable as applied to them.

Mark has worked for all three branches of government.

Registration Options

Choose Your Options

Error Conference Exists In Wish-list.

Congrats Conference Added In Wish-list.


Need Corporate Discount ?


  • * For more than 6 attendee call us at +1-800-803-7592 or mail us at cs@conferencepanel.com
  • * For Check and ACH payment call us at +1-800-803-7592 or mail us at cs@conferencepanel.com
  • * Click to download the Order Form
Mark R Brengelman
Mark R Brengelman

(Attorney at Law, PLLC)

Mark holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Philosophy from Emory University and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Kentucky.

Retiring as an Assistant Attorney General, he now represents:

  • Healthcare professionals
  • Two government healthcare licensure boards
  • A government ethics commission
  • Parents and kids in confidential child abuse and neglect cases, termination of parental rights, and adoption proceedings

Mark is a frequent continuing education presenter including national organizations around the country.  He helps his clients navigate the law and ethics and make the rules understandable as applied to them.

Mark has worked for all three branches of government.